1-561-514-0900 FREE CONSULTATION

What is an Unjust Enrichment Claim In Florida Probate Litigation?

Uncategorized Apr 15, 2019
post about What is an Unjust Enrichment Claim In Florida Probate Litigation?

In Florida probate lawsuits, when can a claim for unjust enrichment be brought? What is a claim for unjust enrichment? Are these claims common in Florida civil litigation or West Palm Beach probate law? In probate court, can a claim for unjust enrichment be based on an express contract?

Unjust Enrichment & Trust Lawsuits

Unjust enrichment is a claim that is usually brought when a contract is breached. There are 3 elements of a claim for unjust enrichment. What are these elements?(1) the plaintiff has conferred a benefit on the defendant (2) the defendant voluntarily accepted and retained that benefit; and (3) the circumstances are such that it would be inequitable for the defendants to retain it without paying the value therof. Virgilio v. Ryland Grp., Inc., 680 F. 3d 1329, 1337( 11th Cir. 2012).When can a Plaintiff in a Florida trust and estates dispute recover from a claim of unjust enrichment?

 Fulton, Fulton Insurance Agency, Inc., and Fulton v. Brancato

In this recent Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal(DCA) case, assets of an insurance agency were sold through an asset purchase agreement (APA).What does this mean? In this APA, the buyer’s agency agreed “to pay [seller’s agency] an amount equal to the one(1) times the actual amount of commission received by the renewals on the clients during the twelve(12) month period after the effective date of this agreement.” A lawsuit was filed when the seller never received the  proper payments from the buyer or the buyers insurance agency. One of the claims was an unjust enrichment claim.The claim said that the buyer and the buyer’s agency were unjustly enriched when they received the assets from the seller’s agency without paying the rational value of those assets. The trial court denied the buyer’s motion for directed verdict on the seller’s claim for unjust enrichment. On appeal, the buyer and their agency argued that, because the jury established that there was an express agreement, “the seller cannot recover under the equitable theory of unjust enrichment.”When there is an express contract, a person can recover damages. Therefore, they can not also claim unjust enrichment.The Fourth DCA agreed.