A person who files a lawsuit typically gets to choose the “venue”…which court hears the case.  Great deference is given to the plaintiff to determine if she wants to sue the defendants where the cause of action acrued or where the defendants reside or do business.  If a lawsuit is filed in the “wrong” state or court, it may be dimissed if there is a more convenient or “better” forum.  The Florida Supreme Court recently discussed the legal concept of “forum non conveniens” in the Cortez v. Palace Resorts case.  Although it is not final  yet, it is instructive.  Email michelle@pankauskilawfirm.com for a copy of the opinion.

A new statute prohibits an estate planning attorney from being a beneficiary “under” a will drafted by that estate planning attorney.  More concisely, gifts to lawyers and lawyers’ relatives “under” a will drafted by the lawyer is void.  See new Florida Statute 732.806.  For a copy of this, email michelle@pankauskilawfirm.com

On June 14, 2013, Florida Governor Rick Scott signed a new 140 page bill into law, creating Florida Statute’s new Chapter 605.  This legislation, Senate Bill No. 1300, is the brand new “Florida Revised Limited Liability Company Act.”  For a copy, email michelle@pankauskilawfirm.com

Florida Governor Rick Scott signed Senate Bill 492 on June 17, 2013, which makes new law for issues involving estate planning, trusts and estates.   Among other things, a gift to a lawyer under a will drafted by that lawyer is void.   The new law also provides guidance on personal jurisdiction in trust lawsuits, service of process issues and rules for filing a caveat or estate tax return . For a copy, email michelle@pankauskilawfirm.com.

A valid Florida power of attorney must be recognized, or accepted, by third parties.  Chapter 709 of Florida’s statutes deals  with powers of attorney and tells us what third parties should do when presented with a valid Florida power of attorney.  Failure to recognize a valid power of attorney may be frivolous and fees may be awarded against a third party that fails to honor the POA without contesting the validity of it.  See the (not final) case of Maximiliana Albelo v. Southern Oak Ins. Co from the January term of Florida’s 3rd District Court of Appeal, opinion filed February 6, 2013.

If the trustee of a Florida trust is also the sole, only, beneficiary, does the Florida trust come to an end?  Does the legal title, which the trustee holds to trust property, merge with the equitable interest of the beneficiary?  Has the settlor’s (or trust creator’s) intent been satisfied?  See Hansen v Bothe 10 So.3d 213 (Florida, 2nd DCA, 2009).

If one seeks to over-turn a will, such as if the maker of the will lacked testamentary capacity, or if the will was the product of undue influence, one must consider other (prior) wills.  If one is successful in attacking and also over-turning a will, the question becomes:  what about prior wills?  Are there valid prior wills, and, if so, are they “revived” or given effect?  This depends on who has standing, what has been alleged and the doctrine of dependent relative revocation.

Most litigators insist on having a court reporter present at all court hearings, even the “simple” hearings.   This makes sense since the cost is relatively small and it provides a record of what was said by whom, and what transpired. Seasoned litigators will tell you that some hearings end up dealing with issues not even set for that particular hearing: all the more reason to have a transcript.   It is not uncommon for court’s orders to be reviewed months or even a year or more later, when memories can fade and issues have been “resolved.”  Reviewing court orders, or the interpreting one, may be aided by a hearing transcript which dealt with that order.  If a court wishes to read beyond the plain language of its order, they are probably going to start at pertinent hearing transcripts.  Have a court reporter with you in court: even for the “agreed” matters and “simple” issues.

At the end of May, 2013, Florida Governor Rick Scott signed a new law which makes certain changes to Florida’s power of attorney statutes, which is contained in Chapter 709  of the Florida Statutes.  Among other things, the changes for Florida powers of attorney expand on how third parties (e.g. brokers) may deal with POAs and how attorneys fees may be awarded in disputes involving POAs.

The Florida Supreme Court has recently held that the economic loss rule is limited to cases of products liability. This is a very “big” change from recent and prior law.   Determining whether or  not a tort  claim is permissible when contractual privity exists in situations other than products liability is now  a thing of the past.  Determining whether a professional services  exception is applicable or not is now a thing of the past.  For a copy of the Tiara Condo opinion, please email  michelle@pankauskilawfirm.com.