1-561-514-0900 FREE CONSULTATION

Trust Attorney Seeks Fees from Guardianship 7 Years Later

Uncategorized Apr 1, 2014

In Palm Beach trust lawsuits, you generally “get” attorneys fees paid for from the Florida trust if you have rendered a benefit to the Florida trust.  Palm Beach probate courts evaluate whether a “benefit” was conveyed very carefully.  Just because you spend money doesn’t mean that you are going to get reimbursed for your Palm Beach trust litigator fees.  Here’s a California trust & guardianship case decided a few days ago where a lawyer wanted fees 7 years after providing services in a trust and guardianship matter.  This case may cause a Palm Beach trust beneficiary, or someone involved in a Palm Beach guardianship case, wonder whether you will get your probate legal fees reimbursed….or whether you pay your guardianship lawyer yourself.

Trust Lawyer Seeks Attorney Fees for Guardianship

  • A trust attorney wanted to get paid from trust funds for service rendered
  • The trust lawyer filed an amended petition for attorney fees seeking payment from a trust for legal work she performed on behalf of a trust beneficiary
  • The probate court said “no”
  • The trust lawyer then moved unsuccessfully for reconsideration of the ruling, and then filed a trust attorney fee appeal – and still lost

Inter Vivos Trust Created

  • 1986, Ann creates an inter vivos trust (the Trust)
  • Ann = sole trustee & beneficiary
  • Ann’s daughter, Diane becomes income beneficiary upon Ann’s death
  • July 1996: Ann resigned as trustee
  • Accountant = new successor trustee.

Revocable Trust Supports Daughter

  • Ann lived with and financially supported her daughter Diane until
  • Anne moves to a care facility
  • Diane remained in Ann’s home

Guardianship Filed

  • September 2003: Ann’s sister files for guardianship
  • a petition for conservatorship of Ann’s person is filed
  • Sister wants a professional fiduciary as guardian

Daughter Fights Aunt Over Guardianship

  • Daughter Diane retained a trust or guardianship attorney to represent her in this guardianship litigation
  • Daughter opposed the Aunt’s guardianship petition
  • Daughter files her own guardianship petition
  • Diane wants to be her mom’s guardian -opposes the professional guardian

Settlement Conference

  • April 30, 2004: the relatives agreed at a mandatory settlement conference to professional guardian
  • Evidently: the fighting family members in this contested guardianship did not resolve who pays the guardianship lawyers

Attorney Wants to Modify Trust

  • A trust lawyer is appointed for Anne
  • May 21, 2004: The trust lawyer files a petition to modify the Trust [ Florida Trust Code also permits a trust modification ]
  • August 25, 2004: the trial court modifies the trust
  • Trustee can pay daughter’s “shelter” and “reasonable monthly utilities,” either by using the Trust income that remained after paying Ann’s monthly expenses, or by invading the Trust principal —-not a bad result for daughter !

Trustee Sues to Remove Daughter From House

  • November 2004: the successor trustee of the revocable trust sues daughter Diane : get out of your mother’s house !
  • Trustee wants to sell house and move daughter into apartment
  • Daughter hires lawyer who defends Daughter and consolidates eviction action with her mom’s guardianship proceeding

Probate Court Modifies Trust to Give $$$ to Daughter

  • May 19, 2005: probate court modified the Trust  for the support & maintenance of daughter
  • Trustee ordered to comply
  • Trustee ordered to get an apartment for trust settlor’s daughter !
  • July 2009: Ann dies
  • Now daughter is trust income beneficiary

7 Year Old Trust Attorney Fee Petition

  • •· August 28, 2012: 7+ years later, the trust lawyer files a petition for attorney fees in the guardianship case
  • •· Trust lawyer wants $31,000 for legal work she did for daughter from 2003-2005

How do you think the court ruled ? Want to read the trust legal opinion from the California appeals court that handled this trust attorney fee dispute: Here’s the link: http://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/nonpub/G048285.PDF