Pankauski Law Firm PLLC

Family Ordered to Return Fraud Property in $4.3 Million Art Theft Case — Lawyer in Jail

Palm Beach estate litigation firms are used to “chasing the money” for their estate clients after winning damages at a Palm Beach probate trial. Once the winning side gets a judgment against a beneficiary or executor, you need begin to satisfy that judgment:  getting your Florida probate clients paid.  What if the defendant or “bad guy” transferred assets before or during the Palm Beach estate lawsuit in an attempt to hide assets?  That’s fraud in Florida and fraud in Massachusetts.  Can you sue the family members who the bad guy transferred the assets to? You betcha! Check out this April 2nd, 2014 Massachusetts opinion about an art thief, a Mass lawyer who had the stolen art and was convicted, and the $4.3 Million civil judgment against him and members of his family, which also involved a trust.  This fraudulent transfer case saw the stolen paintings go from Mass. to London to Geneva back to Mass.  It shows you that one cannot receive stolen property and keep it: you may be ordered to give it back, or worse, pay damages.

Criminal Case of Stolen Art: Lawyer Found Guilty & Sentenced to 7 Years

Art theft and fraudulent transfer case:  the facts are set out in much greater detail in the following case:  United States v. Mardirosian, 602 F.3d 1, 4, 5, 6 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —-, 131 S.Ct. 287, 178 L.Ed.2d 141 (2010). iCi

Civil Lawsuit to Recover Stolen Art Against Family

6 Day Civil Trial — Fraud & Conversion

Did Trial Judge Error ?

Victim appealed the form of the judgment entered against the family members

Why?  on the grounds that money judgments should have been ordered against each of them rather than the equitable remedy of reconveyance

Victim says that the case should not have been dismissed regarding the trust funds transferred to family member

Fraudulent Transfer of  $1.1 Million Home

March 13, 2006: soon after lawyer had been revealed publicly as holder of the stolen paintings, he and his wife transferred their $1.1 Million home to wife’s name alone (fraudulent conveyance in Florida? Yes. In Mass ? (read the opinion))

Victim argues that the judge erred by ordering a judgment providing for avoidance of the transfer and attachment of lawyer’s interest, rather than a money judgment against wife

Here is the link to the slip opinion, http://weblinks.westlaw.com/result/default.aspx?action=Search&cnt=DOC&db=MA%2DORSLIP&eq=search&fmqv=c&fn=%5Ftop&method=TNC&mt=Westlaw&n=3&origin=Search&query=TO%28ALLSCT+ALLSCTRS+ALLSCTOJ%29&rlt=CLID%5FQRYRLT849065125444&rltdb=CLID%5FDB225335025444&rlti=1&rp=%2Fsearch%2Fdefault%2Ewl&rs=MAOR1%2E0&service=Search&sp=MassOF%2D1001&srch=TRUE&ss=CNT&sskey=CLID%5FSSSA45485025444&sv=Split&vr=1%2E0.

But note that the slip opinion webpage will be removed from the ‘Net when the final opinion is ready for publication. So here is the link to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Website so you can access the final opinion later on: http://www.mass.gov/courts/court-info/sjc/

Exit mobile version